.
AUGUST 2008
FEATURES
Taking the Gray Out of Seniors’ Hair by John Ratchford
David Humphrey by Claude Jodoin
TriCoast Photo’s by Alice B. Miller
Should You Sell Your Digital Files? by Bob Coates
The Mercedes-Benz of Portraiture by Greg Phelps
Senior Photography by Beth Forester
Lena Hyde by Amber Holritz
James Williams by Michelle Perkins
Vicki Ann Smith by Larry Brownstein
Chris Nelson by CharMaine Beleele
Jeff Smith’s Senior Sessions by Michelle Perkins
Greg Stangl by Margaret Lane
 
COLUMNS
Digital Photography by John Rettie
Profitable Website Management by Steve Tout
Problems & Solutions by Bill Hurter
Light Reading by Jim Cornfield
 
EQUIPMENT REPORTS
First Exposure by Stan Sholik
First Exposure by John Rettie
 
DEPARTMENTS
Insight/On the Cover by Bill Hurter
Rf Cookbook by Jenni Bidner
Calendar  
Focus  
Hot Pix  
Classifieds  
The Last Word by Jenni Bidner
 


Rangefinder Magazine
April 2006

Click Here for printable version of this article.

Problems & Solutions

Please accompany your questions with a self-addressed stamped envelope if you wish an immediate reply. Alternatively, you can email me at: bhurter@rfpublishing.com.

From: Suzannah’s Photography
suzannahsphoto@elmore.rr.com

If I take a picture of a political candidate for the sole purpose of an ad campaign for that candidate, can the opposing party legally copy that photo and put it on some of their negative campaign materials without my permission?

No, they can’t use your photograph. Your copyright prevents them from using it without your permission. They are probably confusing their rights with the issue of public domain. Politicians, like other celebrities, are public figures, hence you can take their picture in public and use it for almost anything. Your picture is not, however, public domain. I would write a strong letter of protest and tell them to cease and desist.

From: Ronnie W. Clayton
clayton_photography@hotmail.com

I love the magazine and the organization.

I don’t appreciate the incessant attacks on those of us who prefer film to digital. Why don’t you ask digital users when they are going to start using film again? You make it sound like we film users are of a past and dying generation. Shame on you for knocking such a wonderful medium of capture and preservation. Children expect and demand instant gratification, but adults can wait a little longer. So what if I have to wait a few days too see the results of my shooting. If you are comfortable enough with your level of knowledge to shoot film, then you don’t have to look at what you shot five seconds later. So, [give us] cover stories that film shooters are interested in and not just digital users.

Nobody here is attacking film shooters. Notice many of the photographers profiled in this issue are film shooters, but of course we cover digital photography—it’s important. We can’t ignore technology, which is often in the realm of digital. Photographers today fall anywhere on the spectrum from fully film to fully digital.

From: John A. Piccione
Staten Island, NY

Do you think that someday medium format cameras will have digital backs that are much more reasonably priced than today’s prices? I have two Bronicas that are gathering dust since I’ve been shooting with the Fujifilm Finepix S2 and S3 Pro cameras.

I am not optimistic that there will be lowpriced digital backs for medium format cameras in the near future, at least compared to the prices of 35mm DSLRs. Many experts, including our own John Rettie, view the modern professional 35mm DSLR as a replacement for medium format film cameras. Of course, you will always have avid film shooters (see above).

 

Magazine | Marketplace | Classifieds | Contact Us | Subscribe
Rangefinder Guestbook | Media Kit

Copyright © 2008 Rangefinder Publishing, Inc. All rights reserved. View Privacy Statement
Produced by BigHead Technology