|
Rangefinder Magazine
Features
Outside the Box with Robert Hughes:
by Peter Skinner
Making the Usual Unusual
Regardless from which perspective you look
at the creations made by Columbus, Ohio, imagemaker Robert Hughes,
quickly you come to the conclusion that they are definitely unusual.
In fact, one of the creeds by which this musician-turned-photographer
creates is make the usual, unusual.
And if there is one series for which those words are ideal, it is
Hughes outside the box images, thought-provoking
creations which carry titles such as 1024 and Outside
the Box #1 and Games People Play and over which
the observer can puzzle to make the title fit, or apply ones
own imaginative interpretation of the artists meaning or message.
(See http://www.ameritech.net/users/roberthughes/).
For example, 1024 (below left)
looks like the 3D images that pop from the page when you look deep
into the picture, not at it. It contains one thousand and twenty-four
different, distinct and unique images within its interior frame.
Hughes said that each individual element within 1024
was manipulated on a 21-inch monitor at full screen size at a resolution
of 1024 x 768, until each became a unique, stand-alone work of art.
The artists description of the image is as thought-provoking
as the work itself. The interpretation of 1024
is ambiguous. At times 1024 symbolizes an aerial view
of a community which has built its dependence and existence around
a silicon god. At other times, the symbolic nature of
the number 1024 and its inter-relationship to the image could be
relevant, said Hughes. And then he adds yet another element
to the equation: 1024 also happens to be the number of kilobytes
in one megabyte.
One could be forgiven for thinking that this innovative and pioneering
imagemakerwhose work has been described by some observers
as pure geniuswouldve been introduced to photography
in some equally revolutionary and cataclysmic way (you know, bolts
of lightning lighting up dark storm clouds and evoking the observer
to commentI must photograph that!) but the actual
need to make a photograph was quite routine, almost pedestrian.
As Hughes describes it: What brought me to photography was
the need for a family pet photograph. And the final decision to
become a professional was made after being told that I had zero
talent as an imagemaker. He then wryly adds: It is perfectly
normal and natural for left brain people to not comprehend or understand
the language of ambiguity.
Following another traditional start to learning photography, Hughes
began by purchasing photographic books, and followed sage advice
from his father who had commented that if one wishes to discover
the secrets of the world, one need only read. Hughes father
also added, the best way to keep a secret is to write it in
a book.
As is so often the case with successful photographers, Robert Hughes
was blessed with musical talent and played, as he describes it,
A little bit of everything but mainly guitar. I made a living
in the music business for about 22 years. I hope that I was considered
professional. I was initially drawn to science fiction, Mad comic
books, Sun records, jazz and blues but once again, I
like most any music or vehicle that can effectively communicate
feelings and emotions.
And he does think there is a definite correlation between music
and photography, pointing out that much musical terminology/jargon
applies directly to photography. The overall concept of music
as the composition, applies directly to photography. Other translations
such as creativity, tonal values, spontaneity, tension-resolution
management, abstractionism and other things are applicable as well,
he said.
Hughes said that while still a musician he
became aware of Henri Cartier-Bresson and Jerry Uelsman, and after
building a large collection of photographic books, he became familiar
with the work of most, if not all, masters of the medium. Around
1993 I joined a professional organization and began attending seminars.
On one occasion, I even called information for Jay Stocks
telephone number after reading an article about him, he said.
It was while learning his craft through the teachings of others
that Hughes was encouragedgoaded may be more aptinto
creating his outside the box series. I got sick
and tired of seminar speakers stating that photographers need to
get outside the box, without providing any real, practical examples.
At some point I took this literally and began creating images that
started with one black box. A single black box is the only criteria
necessary to begin an image in the Outside The Box Series.
Beyond the obvious implications, symbolism, ambiguities, multi-layering
and mystery of each of the images, there is a hidden switch that
reminds visual communicators to locate the switch that enables each
image to transcend traditional boundaries. This is not exactly Wheres
Waldo? but more like Wheres Waldos concept?
Some of the switches are extremely hard to find and may not even
be on the same page as the image. But most are! he said.
For example, Hughes points out that 1024 is an image,
which has been generated by the computer. Having said this,
I dont wish to leave the impression that one need only to
turn on the computer, click the mouse, and out pops an image. 1024
represents a full, one-year commitment of off and on re-workings,
he said. His other works in the series also pack visual impactthey
are comprised of triangles, rectangles, squares and orbs, abstract
images that draw the eye in and through and about. Games People
Play conjures up images of everything from tic-tac-toe (noughts
and crosses in some parts of the world) to golf (well, they look
like golf clubs to me) all the within boundary lines that could
well be the rules that govern any form of sport or contest. Look
deep and imagine and youll probably be able to see your favorite
sport.
Dont think that Hughes body of work is composed entirely of
computer-generated imagery. Far from it. His approach to photography
is wide ranging and at the 1997 Wedding and Portrait Photographers
International convention in Las Vegas Hughes proved himself a true
multi-dimensional artist with a series of stunning wedding images
created in a style that certainly impressed his peers. One observer,
John VanSteenberg, was so awed by Hughes work that he wrote
the following: Blending natural and computer-enhanced photography
with innate curiosity, beautiful insights and romance, Robert took
his images out of space and time into a new era.
Obviously, the experts who judge such things,
were equally taken and awarded Hughes an average of 95.5 points
on six different images, at that time the highest scoring portfolio
in WPPIs historyand with it a WPPI Grand Award. He followed
up with similar high scoring entries in the 1998 and 1999 WPPI conventions
and capped off the run in 2000 by being given three perfect 100
scores on separate prints, again winning a Grand Award. Professional
Photographers of America, PPA, have bestowed on him all their masters
degrees, including in 1999, the Master of Electronics.
Obviously, his awardsat the national and regional levelsand
other industry tributes are numerous, highlighting the esteem in
which his imagery is held, by peers and clients alike. Additionally,
his reputation has spread beyond the U.S., and he is the first American
to be offered membership (by invitation only) in the European group
of creative photographers, P.A.C.E.Photographers at the Creative
Edge.
These awards and professional accolades testify to the success of
Hughes photojournalistic approach to wedding photography and
the way in which he has married digital with traditional wedding
photographs. Behind that success is dedication and self discipline
and the ability to visualize beyond the ordinary and the usual,
to create the unusual.
One of his peers, and one of the most respected photographers of
his genre in the country, Monte Zucker, has called Robert Hughes
a genius. Hughes is more modest, referring to himself as an introspective
photographic commentator and has written several essays on
this and introspective photojournalism. In one of these
essays he asks, Is photojournalism, wedding or otherwise,
something we can define? Is it more than just taking many pictures,
hoping to obtain one great picture? How are great photojournalism
pictures seen and placed on film? What is the mystique?
First of all, photojournalism is a particular type of approach
or mindset. It reflects a personal method in which to express visually.
Photographers who choose to work in this manner adopt a policy not
to interfere with the action. They believe that they should be so
unobtrusive, so much so, that at the moment of the actual picture
they become invisible. They believe that they should not interrupt,
he said. Hughes adds that he likes to think of his approach to photojournalism
as a type of reportage that is somewhat biased with his own personal
introspective commentary, pointing out that total objectivity is
very hard to achieve.
The difference in my approach is that I state from the beginning
that I intend to produce work that is journalistic in nature, but
introspectively interpreted through my own personal experience,
creativity, and talents. In short, I feel that I am an introspective
photographic commentator, he said.
Through his blending of various technologies
and with infusion of his own talent, Robert Hughes has carved his
own niche. What advice would he give aspiring photographers who
want to enter the profession, or what advice would he give photographers
who might find themselves jaded by making the same images over and
over and seek to get out of a professional rut?
In response he offers Robert Hughes Instructions for
having a life: My father was the first to tell me find
a job you like and you wont have to work a day the rest of
your life. So, make imagingmaking your life! Many people tell
me that I dont have a life. This couldnt be farther
from the truth. I have THE life! Making images is my life! How could
I be so fortunate?
And what is Robert Hughes advice on getting out of the box?
Give yourself permission.
Stop just looking so that you can begin to see.
Self-imposed limitations are the real killer of creativity.
Make it a point to locate the switch that transcends traditional
boundaries.
These are exciting times to be an imagemaker. Its very obvious,
Robert Hughes is making the most of them.
Peter Skinner is communications director
for the American Society of Media Photographers (ASMP) and is a
writer/photographer living in Anacortes, Washington.
|